Build and CI investigation
Measure the existing workflow, inspect the slow stages and make changes against a repeatable baseline. Keep the checks that catch real problems.
Slow builds and unreliable tests make even small changes expensive. I help Android teams find where feedback is getting stuck and improve the checks they use to ship.
For teams with long Gradle or CI runs, fragile UI tests, or too much repetitive manual release testing.
Measure the existing workflow, inspect the slow stages and make changes against a repeatable baseline. Keep the checks that catch real problems.
Choose checks around important behaviour and past failures. Improve unit, integration or UI testing where it gives the team actionable feedback.
Investigate flaky tests, improve their setup and make failures easier to diagnose. Document the workflow so the team can maintain it.
Bring a representative build, a recent pipeline run and the tests that cause the most trouble. We can agree a focused investigation, establish a baseline and choose the first improvement to implement and verify.
Android platform engineering with faster build and delivery workflows.
Strengthening Android UI testing and its infrastructure.
Testing and delivery support for logistics and field operations.
No. The opportunity depends on your project and its constraints. The blackned case study below reports results from that engagement; it is not a forecast for another codebase.
Not necessarily. The aim is useful feedback. Some behaviours are better checked below the UI, while key user journeys may justify end-to-end coverage.
We start by looking at your current pipeline, infrastructure and access constraints. The scope can focus on the parts you can change without replacing the whole setup.
Tell me where the team is losing time: local builds, CI, unreliable tests or manual release checks. Existing timings are helpful if you have them.